And then there were four

DSC_0245

I woke up early this morning with the aim of finishing the last preform, and it has turned out really well.

DSC_0249

Certainly the most Kimberley Point like of the bunch. It took the best part of an hour and wasn’t without its issues. An alternative title for this post might have been ‘how much platform do you need?’ This is because towards the end it is easy to run out of width. When this occurs it is necessary to become judicious with the platforms produced. It is simply a case of changing the edge angle enough to remove a flake. I seem to have got into this with this one and it has resulted in a more refined point that has serrated more easily.

This idea of producing one point per day is a really useful strategy for finding time to produce stuff. Doing so first thing in the morning is also a great way to start the day. Now breakfast.

Advertisements

A ‘lack of progress’ update

My one point per day is working out at one every couple of days. However, I am getting real value out of this lovely piece of glass.

Toolkit

The third point has just been finished and it is the longest. Having got two small points from the first half I split the second large fragment in two using the glass cutter and hammerstone method. It worked perfectly.

I then got work on the third point. We are on holiday and it was roughed out in a glorious 40 minutes sat in the sand dunes at Lindisfarne (Holy Island) yesterday. I spent about 40 minutes on it this morning and have just finished it this evening in the lovely garden of the youth hostel in Whitby.

DSC_0242

Again not perfect but I was losing width and so contented myself with symmetry in plan. Current state of play: three points and still one preform left. Last day of holiday tomorrow.

The point of Tuesday

Today’s point went surprisingly well. I used the second end-shocked part of the same material. And I had a plan.

Reflecting upon the Concrete Experience of producing the last one I realised that Kim Akerman’s description focuses upon working the side panel of a bottle. This glass was plate and thick and so I couldn’t follow the idealised model described here. I decided to confidently approach this second piece with my plano-convex method described here. As discussed previously, the edge preparation process also works to shape the piece. Here you can see both the change in shape and the angled edge that is ideal for starting the long invasive surface removals.

Once prepared all round I started the invasive flaking. When preparing the platforms I followed the angle of the edge. This meant that my surface flaking occurred on either side rather than on one surface first and then the next as prescribed by Akerman for bottles. This seems to work quite well on plate glass and the maxim seems to be: work with the angles that you are given. As the flaking gets deeper it then becomes possible to prepare the edge and work the second face. In this way both faces get flaked ultimately.

Tuesday 4

The point is nice and it was surprisingly quick (less than an hour). I have obviously been able to formulate a road-map or Abstract Conceptualisation for dealing effectively with plate glass. Following my (approximately!) one point per day approach, tomorrow I can address the larger piece I still have left. In doing so I will be engaging in Kolb’s Active Experimentation process.

Kolb’s categories are useful on a number of levels and they have given me some ideas about how to better structure my workshops. In particular I am thinking about how to integrate the Reflective Observation and Abstract Conceptualisation stages. Tomorrow we go on holiday for five days. I am taking my knapping equipment.

On the social aspects of Archaeology

This is a post regarding an interesting story that is currently unfolding. It has made me think about the social aspects of archaeology, especially in relation to what has been termed ‘Stone Age Economics’. My own general interest in stone tools developed into a particular interest in Kimberley Points because many were made from glass, and I had access to glass.

The literature review led me to the work of Kim Akerman, who is clearly the preeminent scholar when it comes to Kimberley Points and how they are made. On Academia.edu it is possible to download Kim’s papers, and the site provides the opportunity to let the author know why you are downloading. I explained why I wanted them and Kim got back to me directing me to two particular papers, and two good historical texts. After a brief email interaction Kim had answered my immediate questions and sent me a couple of his Powerpoints on the subject for good measure.

This set me off on my journey, and closer to home I contacted Eleanor Casella in our own University of Manchester Archaeology department. Eleanor is a historical Archaeologist who has worked in Australia and it transpired that she had excavated and found some Kimberley Points. She was really helpful explaining to me the ins and outs of the period glass that was used, and really interested in getting a couple of replicas off me for her teaching collection. I have discussed these before, but to break up the text here is a picture of a museum example and my own interpretation in green.

KP2

A couple of weeks ago Eleanor emailed to say a friend and colleague from Australia, Denis Gojak, was visiting the department and she could furnish introductions. We couldn’t meet up as it happens but he liked the points I had made for Eleanor and offered me some Australian period glass if I wanted it. Whilst it seems illogical to ship discarded glass fragments from Australia to the UK, Denis explained that his finds were sorted into: Special Finds; Reference Finds; and Discard. This was the discard material and he had financial provision to dispose of it. Kindly Denis has agreed to dispose of it in my direction.

With a 10 KG box coming I asked Denis if it would be possible to throw in a couple of other items if ‘lying around’, such as a Kangaroo ulna, Number 8 wire, and some Calytrix microphylla, a hardwood from a scrubby tree in the northern territories. All items used by aboriginals for pressure flaking. Denis rose to the challenge and put me in touch with his friend John Pickard, a botanist who…studies rural fences! John is now on the case and has a field trip planned (starting tomorrow) to western New South Wales and has offered to collect the above items on my behalf.

What is going on here? No money is changing hands for these services, but people I have never met are buying into the idea of me producing these artefacts using authentic materials. And they are going to some trouble to help me to do so. Through these objects I seem to have tapped into a network of like minded and like hearted individuals who are prepared to share their expertise and resources freely.

I teach one workshop titled ‘Stone Age Economics’ and one part of it discusses Bronislaw Malinowski’s (1922) work on the Kula Ring and gift exchange. Through the exchange of gifts social relationships are forged. The gift facilitates the relationship. Whilst preparing the workshop for that session I also read Debt: the first 5000 years by David Graeber. In it he talks about how the current way of thinking about exchange mathematically and financially is a relatively new phenomenon. Underlying this relatively new mode of financial operation is the innate human approach of swapping favours, without precisely equating six of these with one of those. It feels as though something akin to this is unfolding here. We are apparently a shared community who all invest some value in Kimberley Points and their production. Or at least we know and value our relationship with someone else who does. These favours are not being measured precisely, but being given whole heatedly from either the intellectual or practical estate from which the individual can give. Perhaps the process of giving and receiving is how we construct and reconstruct ourselves within the various communities we operate within. This is an open-ended post in that I have no conclusions on the topic. I will be delivering the Stone Age Economics lecture again this coming semester and would like to include these exchanges in it. Let’s see.

Graeber, D. 2009. Debt: the first five thousand years. New York. Mellville House Publishing.

Malinowski, B. 1922. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. New York: EP Dutton & Co.

One point per day. I am an optimist

I have just finished an epic ‘negotiation’ with a lovely liquorice coloured, 10mm thick piece of period plate glass. I started it yesterday evening, and finished it this morning. The complete process falls within a 24 hour period, but that would be what is termed ‘special pleading’. I just want to do one point per session per day. The glass is really lovely and the thickness presented some real learning opportunities.

toolkit-e1503916400285.jpg

This was the toolkit I started with. I wasn’t at home and forgot to bring my abrading stone (mistake). This morning at home I employed the abrading stone and a piece of leather to protect my hand as by then it was getting sore.

Glass cutter and hard hammer

Because the glass was exceptional I wanted to make the most of it. This meant splitting it, and to do so I used a glass cutter and then gently hard hammered along the ‘cut’. This strategic use of modern and traditional approaches resulted in two decent sized pieces. Trust in God, and tie your camel, so to speak.

Optimistic

I have been told that the experimental archaeologist Bruce Bradley draws onto the core an outline of the flake he is about to remove, and then goes on to remove it. I outlined the shape of the point I was aiming for, thereby identifying the material needing to be removed.

Actualistic

I started using the pressure flaker to remove this excess material. However, the bump visible on the bottom left was proving problematic and so I tried the hard hammer. This resulted in what is called end-shock or hitting it at one point (the bump) and it breaking at another (in the middle). On the plus side I now had two more halves to work with. I continued with the left-hand piece.

Edge preparation

This is an example of good edge preparation. The ultimate aim here is to apply deep invasive flakes to the upper face. In preparation to do so I worked along the edge of the upper face removing short flakes and creating a steep edge angle. This provides a good platform angle to then apply the desired deep invasive flakes to the upper surface. This platform preparation process can be used to simultaneously shape the piece.

Stack

However, it is not as simple as it sounds. Here I ran into problems again where the angle didn’t work and I created a lump. Whilst not exactly at this point, it was with a couple of these problems that I left the piece last night. This morning I was able to re-address these issues more patiently. To do so I had to work back to the last point where I could get a good preparatory removal, and then edge along from there. When I could go no further I would move back a little along the edge and take a large deep invasive removal out. This effectively removes a lot of supporting material and provides a negative bulb that can again be worked. Complicated to explain, and I am learning on the job so to speak. Dealing with lumps like this involves losing width.

finished point

Anyway, the net result is good. This piece embodies a lot of my learning and working out. The really beautiful museum examples are perhaps so because the working out had been done a long time before, a working out that translates into bodily understanding. Consequently, on the museum examples we see confident and systematic flaking which leads to a clean and aesthetic conclusion.

The one point per day may be a little optimistic for me. With hindsight, if I was really being goal focused  I could have chosen an easier piece of glass and started the process earlier in the day. However, this glass is beautiful and I have taken time to negotiate a lot of issues that in the past would have been the end of the road. Furthermore, the first thing I did this morning was to get outside and continue with this piece. The deadline presents a focus upon an end product, and the learning process becomes a by product of the action. However a conscious focus upon the process is where the learning and understanding occurs. I have been reading about learning theory and this ‘making’ process is what David Kolb (1984: 30) has classed as Concrete Experience. As I sit now writing this blog I am reflecting upon this Concrete Experience and engaging in Kolb’s opposing category of Reflective Observation. Reflective Observation allows me to upgrade my understanding based upon the new experiential ‘data’ acquired through paying attention within the process. Doing so allows me to develop a new Abstract Conceptualisation or road map of what I need to do in order to make a Kimberley Point. With the next Kimberley Point I make I will be able to test out the usefulness of this new and upgraded Abstract Conceptual road map to see if it helps. The testing out process Kolb terms Active Experimentation. This brief four stage description isolates what is in fact a dynamic and blurred process of human action. However, the idea and practice of producing one new point per day provides a nice 24 hour learning unit within which this four stage process can occur, again and again. A further benefit is that it seems to get me out of bed in the morning!

Kolb, D.A., 1984. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey. Prentice-Hall Inc.

Scotch Whisky Lize Bard

I have been impressed by another blogger recently. Lize Bard is a poet and photographer, and if you follow Lize’s blog you receive a haiku every day. It has become the first thing I read of a morning and it is a lovely way to start the day. The most impressive aspect to me though is the discipline Lize demonstrates producing a new piece on a daily basis. It has inspired me to up my game and produce a new point everyday. I am not sure what I am letting myself in for here, but this is today’s.

Scotch whisky

This is the original fragment from a Scotch Whisky bottle.

Scotch WhiskeyIt is period glass again and this time a different set of problems. Although ostensibly a flat side panel it was in fact of uneven thickness. I went for length and in doing so had to manage both unusually thin and thick sections  at different points along the length of the piece. It would have perhaps been better to have gone for a shorter point with a thick base and thin tip. But I didn’t. It has worked out OK, although because of the thinness the flaking is not as punchy as on the previous point. I have also not fully removed a longitudinal curve, and to continue trying would have really reduced the width of the piece. That said I am happy with the different styles of retouch I can bring to bear to resolve the various problems encountered. So a little like myself, it is not perfect but fairly presentable. In the right light. See you tomorrow.

A pressure flaking photo essay

This post is brief through necessity as it was done on my phone, on the tram. It shows the prescribed Kimberley Point process applied to the side panel of a period glass bottle. The last image shows the style of retouch I have been aiming for. It is not finished, but in this raw state it illustrates these aspects well. T.B.C!

DSC_0124

Period beer bottle section.

dsc_0132.jpgConcave inner surface worked first to shape and flatten.

dsc_0131.jpgConvex outer surface still unworked.

dsc_0134.jpg

Convex outer surface with regular deep invasive flaking.